In the 20+ years that I’ve been flying as a paying adult, I’ve flown Southwest airlines far more than any other airline in the world. I’ve been fortunate enough to travel to more than 60 countries and to enjoy some of the fanciest business and first class products in the world over the past decade, but despite my enjoyment of fancy flying, I have chosen Southwest for the vast majority of our domestic trips, which has meant that I haven’t flown any other airline nearly as many times (nor nearly as many miles I’d bet). We’ve consistently chosen Southwest for many years because they’re different. Unfortunately, Southwest will soon become almost the same as any other domestic carrier. What now? Will I still choose Southwest?
Southwest changes make them less different
For as long as I can remember, Southwest was different. From the plastic boarding cards I remember in the early 00’s to the time a flight attended serenaded my flight as we taxied to our gate with the closing lyrics, “We hope you’ve enjoyed our hospitality, marry one of us and you’ll fly for free”. Southwest has often put a smile on my face.
Big changes are on the way next month that will shake things up entirely. Many of the things that have long made my family loyal to Southwest will end or change, such as:
- Bags Fly Free no more. While we’ve never needed 2 checked bags per passenger in my family, we almost always travel with a checked bag or two. We just spent the Easter holiday visiting family and we packed an entire suitcase full of gifts for our new niece (and my wife filled it for the return trip with some great local finds from Facebook marketplace). Free checked bags has been a major advantage for Southwest since we haven’t had a United credit cards for years and have never had one with Delta or JetBlue.
- Boarding policy. This isn’t changing next month, but rather when Southwest begins selling seating assignments later this year for travel next year. I know that many people hate Southwest’s boarding process. In the 20+ years I’ve been flying Southwest, it has never bothered me in the slightest. Before kids, I would often carry a $50 bill in my pocket to offer someone to switch seats if my wife and I needed it, but we never had to use it. In the 7+ years since our first son was born, we’ve continuously had at least one kid under 6 years of age, so we’ve been boarding after “A” group without worry about check-in time. We’ve never had a problem getting our preferred seats near the back of the plane.
- Redemption rates that we could count on. While I love to get far outsized value as much as anyone, it has been convenient to know what I could expect from Southwest points in terms of purchasing power as compared to cash rates. We never got incredible value, but we knew we wouldn’t get poor value, which was a competitive advantage over collecting competitor miles for domestic travel.
- Flight credit that never expires. This was a pandemic-era change, but we’ve loved having the ability to book now and change plans later without being boxed into an expiration date on flight credit. I haven’t hesitated to book Southwest cash tickets even when plans weren’t solidified. Moving forward, I will be far more hesitant to book Southwest flights with cash, particularly for travel far in advance since a cancellation close to departure may leave me with a flight credit due to expire without much time to use it.
- Happy, bubbly employees (usually). My experiences with Southwest employees have been largely positive over the years. Not every interaction has been perfect, but flight attendants in particular have often been notably cheerful. With cuts to staff events, layoffs, and policy changes sure to sour customers on the airline, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a shift in attitude among employees.
Changes coming in the above areas will not make Southwest remarkably worse than competitor airlines, it will just make Southwest more similar to the competition. As disappointed as I am in all of the above, I’m not sure that the changes will yet chase me away from Southwest.
Southwest will still be the same
I don’t love the ways that Southwest will soon be different (or less different from competitors depending on your perspective). However, some key things are either staying the same or will effectively be the same for my family.
- The hard product isn’t changing (yet). Let me be clear: Southwest cabins and seats aren’t special compared to other airlines. The part of the product that has kept us coming back is the consistency in the model of plane. Southwest exclusively flies 737s, so there is a consistency of product that matters. My wife loves to travel, but it causes her a great deal of anxiety (I know she’s not alone there!). The consistency of Southwest’s product means that every plane hass a 3-3 seating layout that isn’t going to make her feel extra claustrophobic. For the time being, this will continue to be a factor that might make us choose Southwest, though it will feel far more like a compromise than it once did.
- The Southwest Companion Pass remains a great deal. We have had a Companion Pass in our household every year for more than a decade. It has gotten more use some years than others, but we have long valued having it as it has long made Southwest the better option (even considering increased prices we’ve seen on Southwest in recent years). I wrote posts for years asking whether the Companion Pass was still worth it, and year after year the answer was a clear yes. Contrary to a commonly flawed logic, Southwest points are not worth double for Companion Pass holders, but the pass nonetheless helps us save year after year.
- We’ll still get a free bag x 4 and priority boarding. This is because my wife has the Southwest Rapid Rewards Priority credit card. Cardholders will get 1 free checked bag per passenger for up to 8 passengers on the same reservation (plus one for their companion if they are a companion pass holder). This means that our family could still check up to 4 bags. While that’s half the allowance today, I don’t think we’ve ever checked more than four bags anyway. And since the Priority card comes with an annual $75 Southwest credit and 7,500 points at anniversary, we easily justify the $149 annual fee even before whatever seating benefit they offer (they’ve said that it will offer a seating benefit, but we don’t yet have details).
- Flexibility might allow us to take advantage of outsized redemption. While I don’t love the new dynamic pricing model, there is a chance that we’ll be able to take advantage of those situations where flights provide outsized value thanks to greater-than-average flexibility in terms of dates and times.
Southwest has certainly lost some of its luster, but the truth is that the above will probably keep us loyal to Southwest, but with less enthusiasm.
Southwest points are less valuable now. Southwest points about to be more valuable.
I recently updated our Reasonable Redemption Value for Southwest Rapid Rewards points. I found that points are on average less valuable than they were previously.
At the same time, points value for low-demand flights (which is to say the cheapest flights in most cases) has increased. An obvious play in some situations will be to book a cheap Wanna Get Away Plus fare at elevated value per point, looking to same-day change to a more ideal itinerary (when this is possible). Southwest claims that they do not oversell flights. In the past, this has meant that if someone else has cancelled a seat after midnight local time on the day of departure, it would pop into inventory making space available for a same-day change to their flight. However, we recently had a reader report that a seat their family member cancelled did not go back into inventory. I thought that something must have been awry, but then as I walked to my Southwest gate over the weekend, I heard gate agents for 3 separate Southwest flights looking for volunteers to bump to a later flight. It is possible that all of those were a matter of weight-and-balance issues or crew needs….or perhaps the activist investors running Southwest have implemented changes to the overbooking policy that haven’t yet been published. I don’t know for sure.
However, the reason I say that Southwest points are about to be more valuable is because cash is going to become a less desirable means to book a Southwest flight. Points will become more valuable to me because cash bookings will become less attractive.
Here’s what I mean: Imagine that I wanted to book a flight today for travel on January 3rd, 2026 (perhaps for the way home at the end of the holiday break). Now imagine that plans change the day before departure (on January 2, 2026) and I needed to cancel that flight. If I paid with cash, I would end up with a Southwest credit due to expire (at best) in less than 4 months, on April 25, 2026. Worse yet, if my booking were for a Basic Economy fare (not yet available, but coming soon), I believe I’d end up with nothing since cancelled Basic Economy tickets will get credit that expires 6 months from date of purchase (which will have already passed). If I booked using Rapid Rewards points, those points would go right back into my account and the taxes and fees could be refunded to my original payment method with no expiration to track or worry about.
The flexibility of cancellations was long a selling point for Southwest Rapid Rewards points. The luster of that faded as all airlines began offering free cancellation and both Southwest and others removed expiration dates from flight credits. Now that flight credits are changing for the worse, I’ll be even more inclined to use my points for flight bookings — and I may even consider transferring points to Southwest in the right scenario. Now that they are a Bilt transfer partner, that gives me another option to top off my account.
A week or two ago, a member of our Facebook group asked a question about transferring points to Southwest Rapid Rewards. In response, I noted that I had never transferred a point to Southwest in the past because of the lack of ability to get outsized value for points and that I would likely never consider transferring to Southwest moving forward without a specific near-term use in mind since the dynamic pricing model makes it possible to get really poor value for points.
However (spoiler alert!), as we recorded this week’s podcast yesterday, I began relaying that story and sentiment when I caught myself and realized that the coming change to Southwest flight credits makes a material difference that might make transfers to Southwest more appealing than they have been in recent years.
The Companion Pass is still a great coupon
I noted this above, but the Southwest Companion Pass, at least thus far, remains a great deal. Earn 135,000 points or more in a single calendar year (or 125,000 points for cardholders) and a companion flies for free for the rest of that year and the entire following calendar year, paying only the taxes on the flight. The fact that this buy-one-get-one coupon can be used repeatedly makes if highly valuable for anyone who will primarily fly with a companion. In my own case, I’ve found that even in cases where Southwest is more expensive than competitors, the companion pass has meant that Southwest is a better deal for me.
I refer to the pass as a coupon intentionally because that’s how it functions. If you always travel as a pair, you can think of the companion pass as a repeatable coupon good for 50% off. It is important to make the distinction between it being that type of coupon versus being an instrument that makes points more valuable. A common misconception is that points are “worth double” if you have the Southwest Companion Pass. That’s simply not true. Here’s an explanation that I recently gave someone:
Imagine a passenger named Ryan, who doesn’t have a companion pass, and a passenger named Shane, who does have a companion pass.
Ryan doesn’t have a companion pass. Ryan wants to book a flight for 2 passengers that costs 10,000 points or $100 for 1 passenger. Ryan has two options:
- Use $200 to buy tickets for two passengers
or - Use 20,000 points to buy tickets for two passengers.
Using 20,000 points keeps $200 in Ryan’s pocket. Points are worth $0.01 per point in this example.
Shane has a companion pass. Shane wants to book a flight that costs 10,000 points or $100 for 1 passenger. ***Shane’s choice is different because Shane the Companion Pass essentially provides Shane with a Buy One, Get One coupon***. Shane has two options:
- Use 10,000 points to buy tickets for two passengers
or - Use $100 to buy tickets for two passengers
Using 10,000 points keeps $100 in Shane’s pocket. Points are worth $0.01 per point in this example. Using 10,000 points doesn’t keep $200 in Shane’s pocket because Shane wouldn’t have needed to spend $200 for those tickets. Shane’s cash option was to use $100. If Shane had zero points, Shane wouldn’t have to spend $200, Shane would have to spend $100.
The Companion Pass is a great coupon, but it doesn’t increase the value of the points any more than it increases the balance of your bank account, it just decreases the cost of 2 passengers. If you have $500,000 in the bank, you don’t become a millionaire with the Companion Pass, you just get the chance to pay less for your flights, whether with cash or with points.
To be clear, this isn’t a knock on the Companion Pass. In the example above, Shane gets to use half the points or half the cash that Ryan does. That’s an great deal whether Shane is using points or cash.
The changes stink, but probably won’t change my habits
The bottom line for me is that Southwest will likely continue to be my go-to airline for domestic travel as long as they continue to fly a consistent product, offer a checked bag for credit card holders, and maintain the Companion Pass in its current form.
We won’t be as enthusiastic about Southwest as we once were. And I won’t necessarily recommend Southwest to friends or family since there won’t be any benefit to choosing Southwest for those who aren’t particularly savvy to the types of things we do to travel more for less. Since they won’t get free checked bags, flight credits that won’t expire if plans change, and family boarding, there isn’t a reason for infrequent travelers to pick Southwest over American, United, Delta, etc.
However, thanks to the broader techniques we use to make travel more affordable, the coming changes won’t be as bad for us as they look. And despite never having transferred a point to Southwest in the past, I could now imagine transferring to Southwest for the better cancellation situation if I didn’t have enough points for an award and didn’t want to risk being stuck with an expiring travel credit.
If and when Southwest starts flying other plane models, reduces the value of the companion pass, or brings costs far enough out of line with competitors to make them more expensive even after considering the companion pass, our loyalty may change quickly. After all, I would rather collect an airline currency that I can use for outsized value with partners and/or earn elite status that will extend my benefits to numerous partner airlines the way I could with American, United, or Alaska. But between the Companion Pass and consistency of product and our ability to maintain similar benefits through credit cards, we don’t yet have enough reason to switch loyalty. Here’s hoping Southwest doesn’t push us the rest of the way.

I’ve also had CP for over 10 years now and have flown SWA so much that I’ve earned status even though most of my flights were paid with points. For the first time in a decade, I’m looking elsewhere for domestic flights. CP might still be valuable, but now that same-day change is tied to higher fare products instead of status (along with all the other changes), it’s going to become much less valuable.
When Frontier offered their status match, I looked at them for the first time. I could fly them to someplace like Vegas for $19/person (if purchased at airport) and have bags and seat selection included with Gold status. Schedule isn’t great and IRROPs could strand you, but it’s an alternative. I never would have considered them if it weren’t for SWA’s ridiculous changes.
Congratulations to SWA for driving away their most loyal customers.
Hi nick, what have your heard about the Southwest policy on oversized passengers being able to obtain an extra seat and then be reimbursed for the cost of the extra seat?
Oh, and great article. You did a great job of laying out all of the changes in a very understandable way. Thank you!
You killed the Wyndham casino status free casino deal by touting it every couple weeks. It was excessive and got all the blogs to copycat. You are going to kill the companion pass too. Been around forever but you just hound in it constantly. You need to figure out something new rather than oversell the existing ones .to point they get shut down. Seriously – figure something new.
I disagree with your assertions, sir
I agree – I believe that it is a very percentage of CP holders that get outsized value out of CP that truly cost SW money – I think it gets a certain amount of breakage –
Plus SW non-Hub Spoke model is far less popular as you tend to have multiple stops/plane change or exchange pax – it may change some – now that SW is flying red-eyes – we much prefer red-eyes flying to East coast from PNW and not losing basically a whole day traveling because of Time zone time loss in addition to the 5~7hrs (MIA-PDX is ~7ish hours and PDX-MIA is 5.75hrs)
Southwest goes out of their way to promote the companion pass. Not in the same ballpark as casino matching to cruises, which didn’t really blow up until the Wyndham Business card came around (and free cruises still exist if you have real casino status!).
The companion pass probably will die in the next few years but that’s because Elliott management will extract every dollar they can out of Southwest, not because of travel bloggers.
Nicely written article by Nick about the SW Companion Pass. Thank you!
Southwest’s biggest value is the Companion Pass. Once that is gone, the party is over. Considering that the current management and other stakeholders only see earnings, it is just a matter of time.
Just think if the current management team had the foresight to upgrade the IT, the disaster of late 2023, would not have happened. The company would not have lost so much money and many of these current changes might not have happened. But nothing proves to me that this management team has learned anything.
Attention Readers!
Nick brings up an extremely distressing point about expiring flight credits.
Nick points out that WGA bought more than 6 months in advance but cancelled 6 months and a day after purchase will “end up with nothing since cancelled Basic Economy tickets will get credit that expires 6 months from date of purchase (which will have already passed)”.
There is no way that consumers should lose the ability to get the refund before the flight is scheduled.
Unless I’m wrong on the ethics or legality of this, I am sure that the class action community will be all over SWA. I assume that it violates many State laws, but am not a lawyer.
Meanwhile I think that we all need to call/email/chat/post on social media to put the pressure on SWA to change the start date to cancellation date instead of purchase date. It is just plain NOT RIGHT for a business to impose this on it’s customers.
I’m not a lawyer myself, but when you book a nonrefundable hotel stay and cancel before the stay, you don’t get anything back. And historically, before COVID, if you cancelled a nonrefundable flight, you didn’t get anything back (that policy was the norm for decades). And I think that’s still the case for basic economy tickets with some airlines? Again, I’m no lawyer, but if that violated state law or was fodder for a class action lawsuit, I imagine that wouldn’t have been and continue to be the norm.
I’m not saying it’s good or customer-friendly — it is neither.
Nick-
Everything you say is 100% true in the historical sense and with the policies of some airlines now to make basic fares nonrefundable.
However, SWA has a published policy and it’s in the contract of carriage that you can get a refund via a travel credit, which is good for six months. It’s completely unreasonable of them to sell you a ticket further out in time that six months if their policy is to refund with a travel credit, which will be good for six months
I never thought I’d say this, but we need an opinion from a lawyer.
How confident can we be that the Companion Pass won’t be negatively impacted? Or that the ability to earn one with credit cards won’t be nerfed this fall? I was purposely planning to be under 5/24 to get one again this year, but I’m not sure it’s worth it now.
Nobody knows.
As long as there will be a way to extend the flight credits easily by booking a new flight and canceling, I won’t be upset by these changes. That’s the only thing I’m worried about.
Reading the terms, I think you can start being upset.
I need to use up my Amex Platinum flight credits. So as long as you cancel a SW flight before their D-Day (end of May) you’ll get flight credit with no expiration?
Correct. But keep in mind that you will be subject to the new rules for that credit when you use it to book something from May 27th onward.
They nuked earning rates on paid flights from 6X down to 2X.
They require a credit card to have 1X free bag (same as everyone else) vs. before you got 2X for free with no requirement to hold the credit card.
Points are now worth less cpp on average (1.1 vs. 1.4).
Flight credits now expire after a year, whereas they previously didn’t have an expiration.
At the end of the day, if Southwest’s route network and flight schedule works for you, sure, go ahead and fly them. But they are worse than the big three now.
Very good point about nerfing the earnings on paid flights. That was an awful change. It didn’t even come to mind as I so rarely pay in cash / earn so few points from revenue fares that I don’t pay much attention. That’s hugely negative for those paying out of pocket for flights though!
Regarding CPP average, I took hundreds of examples when redoing our RRVs. Median and Average were both right around 1.3cpp. 1.1cpp was the minimum end of the spectrum, nowhere near average.
1 bad per person with a credit card vs 2 bags per person without is certainly a negative change. That said, we travel as a family of four. Never in my life have we checked 8 bags. I don’t think we’ve ever checked four bags — so one per person will do for us. We’re going to keep a Priority card in the household regardless since the math easily pencils out on it for anyone who likes to fly Southwest. In fact, I haven’t put much thought into this, but I’d argue that the math pencils out better on the Priority card than almost any other airline card I think.
I’m certainly not arguing that Southwest is better than others. I agree that they have given up their competitive advantage and I said as much. I’m disappointed in Southwest for that. But the changes probably won’t affect my choice to fly them because I don’t care much about earnings on paid flights (I’m not paying enough cash out of pockets for all of my flights on all airlines over the course of a year for my earnings from paid flights to be of any significance, which I recognize is not the case for everyone but it is for me), we’ll keep a credit card and four checked bags will be enough for us, and Southwest will still have the consistency of product that we like. I’ll be unhappy when they begin charging for seat assignments and I won’t be enthusiastic about Southwest anymore, but I realized that these changes aren’t going to make a big difference for me.
Former 17 yr Southwest employee though my wife entered her 22nd yr for Southwest. Not the airline it once was. Very toxic work environments all over in all the work groups and Southwest Leadership does nothing about it. They encourage hostility plus never follow up with Employees and Customers.
Terrible Leadership put Southwest in this predicament
The argument about whether the companion pass doubles the value of your points is one that mostly appeals to hopeless pedants. Since I myself am a hopeless pedant, here’s my analysis.
In the simplest analysis, Nick is correct. Ryan (not his real name) and Shane (not anybody’s real name) can each exchange their points for a penny a piece and therefore they have the same value.
However, you’re failing to consider several laws of physics here as well as one of economics.
Imagine passless Ryan with 10,000 points to his pseudonym intending to buy those two $100 seats tomorrow. That’s $200 of value to current-Ryan. If, overnight, Ryan were to obtain a companion pass, then future-Ryan would get $200 worth of value from 10,000 points AS MEASURED BY current-Ryan. So we can see:
1. The way in which the pass affects the value of the points depends on the observer. For Shane the points are worth a penny each but to current-Ryan they’re worth two cents each with the pass.
2. The act of acquiring the pass, somewhat perversely, LOWERS the value of the points. For current-Ryan the pass would make his points worth two cents each, but as soon as he acquires the pass the points drop in value to one cent!
Also, it’s probably a flaw to calculate the value of the points in terms of currency when what’s actually being “traded” here is airfare. What’s really happening is that the companion pass is doubling the value of your points AND ALSO YOUR DOLLARS when measured against “flight value”.
We all instinctively know what “flight value” means — it’s the numerator of the equation value / miles we use to calculate CPP and that Frequent Miler uses to calculate RRV. Without it miles become worthless because (using Nick’s companion pass logic) once you have the miles you don’t cash to purchase the ticket.
Does that sound illogical? What’s illogical is the notion that the simple acquisition of the pass turns $200 “worth” if travel into only $100. We all know those are still $200 tickets valued in “flight dollars” rather than “dollar dollars”. If tickets were freely resellable you could unload them for a hair under $200 (or potentially much more as the flight approaches).
So the correct way (or, at least, A correct way) of looking at the companion pass is that it allows you to obtain $200 flight-dollars worth of travel for $100 of cash or 10,000 points, thus doubling the value of both the points and the cash.
This reminds me of WestJet ( bear with me ). Prior to 2020 WestJet dollars ( their points currency ) could buy you “ member exclusive fares “. These fares were $125 for all one way domestic tickets plus taxes and fees. This could save hundreds of dollars off the published cash fare. Because WestJet dollars could be bought in points.com for $1 each the bloggers only valued WestJet dollars at $1 each even though member exclusive fares unlocked outsized value.
By 2020 WestJet member exclusive fares disappeared and a one way YYZ – YVR now costs > $300 WestJet dollars ( WSD ) plus taxes and fees instead of $125. What’s more Points.com still sold WSD but for $2 per WSD. So before WSD are worth $1 each because you could purchase them at that price. After a massive devaluation bloggers still value them at $1 each since they buy exactly $1 of flight. So weird.
Well thought out analysis. I like it!
Nicely done. I think we all get Nick’s point, which is good and valid, when “value of your points” is understood specifically in terms of CPP. But, I think he overlooks that “value of your points” is linguistically ambiguous between that reading and various others, perhaps the most salient for many being “how much product do I get for my points” (i.e., purchasing power). On that reading, as you suggest, the SW CP does double the value of one’s points (just as it doubles the value of one’s dollars).
For me, the changes at SW put it back into play for my short hops. I prefer assigned seats. While I prefer a domestic first class type seat, I’ll take an extra leg room seat. For long-tenured SW flyers, the changes might not be welcome. But, I’ll take them as a whole.
I think Southwest destroying their brand will be bad for their long term, but short term I think you are right that some of their losses could be offset by other fliers considering them now with assigned seats.
Southwest has no first class seats, but for domestic economy I would say they have a better product then most of their competitors. You know you will get a 737 on all routes compared to a regional jet that might force you to gate check carry on bags. Their seat pitch as of now is better than other airlines, and when they finish reconfigurations they’ll still have a larger number of extra legroom seats than other carriers thanks to the lack of first class cabin. I agree with Nick they have better flight attendants than my experiences with other airlines. They have a pretty consistent wifi product on board and I don’t think the lack of separate IFE screens is a big deal for most domestic routes.
Long term I think they’re in trouble. I don’t see them keeping the advantages of better seat pitch and newer planes forever, and employee morale is going to tank which will erase any soft product advantage. Without that they’re going to lose business travel to those chasing status and first class seats with a legacy carrier, and they’ll lose price conscious domestic travelers to Frontier, Spirit, etc. Long term they either settle in as another ULCC or get absorbed by someone else in bankruptcy. I guess we all get to watch the train wreck unfold.
Andrew, why do you think morale is going to tank?
Read the comment above by Dan, a former Southwest employee with a P2 still there. Southwest was already starting to lose ground a bit and then the drastic moves forced by Elliott are not going over well. Understandably – I don’t think anyone trusts their company leadership more when they suddenly do mass layoffs for the first time in company history not that long after promising they would not do them.
I think Southwest has already lost the price conscious domestic travelers to Frontier and Spirit. Southwest prices have not been low for a long time, at least 6 or 7 years.
If Spirit or Frontier serve the route you need, they can certainly present a much better deal. I wish they served my home airport. Unfortunately, Spirit doesn’t serve my home airport at all and I believe Frontier has a single route that doesn’t have daily service and very limited connecting options. The problem with either is very limited connecting options and service that is in some cases once a day or 3 times a week where there is no backup option. If you live in an area well-served by those airlines though, I could certainly imagine flying them a good bit!
We referred 4 relatives to open credit cards so we could get enough points for the companion pass last year and were surprised to receive a 1099 this year for $800, their value for the 80k bonus points. So our tax bill was unexpectedly higher. It was still worth 23 months of a free companion, and the use of the 80k extra points, but a surprise for us.
If bonuses from a given card issuer (not associated with your own spending) add up to $600 or more per year, you will receive a 1099 from that card issuer.
Living proof that’s true. Just never knew it before lol
As Lee indicates, referral bonuses in excess of $600 generate a 1099 from all issuers. The good news is that you’ll get even more than $800 in value out of the points, so the value you get there + the value of the companion pass far exceed the amount it costs in taxes even if you’re at the top bracket.
I do think it is odd to pay tax on what is essentially monopoly money that any loyalty program would surely tell you has no cash value and belongs to the airline / can be zeroed our by the loyalty program at any time. But c’est la vie.